Free books! Free books!

Last Days and Times and Harmonic RES

Today’s special is not the salmon patty with macaroni and cheese, but two free books from the Kindle Store! Get your clicking finger ready because two of my books are now on sale at Kindle, but for a limited time.

Last Days and Times, my supernatural fantasy thriller, is free at the Kindle Store through Saturday, June 15, 2013. It’s a five-star rated novel of modern apocalypse, including seers, immortals, and nuclear terrorism. It isn’t like those crappy apocalypse novels that preach ‘this is what happens if you ain’t straight with the Lord.’ Last Days and Times takes a grittily snarky look at Christian fanaticism and preaches the importance of being bad-ass. Get it this week for nothing as an introduction to all the other works I’ll be releasing over the next few weeks.

Here’s your link for Last Days and Times. Go! Fetch! You won’t regret it.

Harmonic RES is a pleasantly different animal. It’s a short fiction collection in which I present a number of short stories and novellas of varying genres but on the same broad theme. Through this book, you can go to Mars — twice! You go to Europe in the 1980s, to a beleaguered inner city public school, to cyberspace, and to weird cornfields  while in the back seat of a police car. It’s good stuff. It’s rated five stars. It’s free through Thursday, June 13, 2013.

Here’s your link to Harmonic RES.

This offer isn’t likely to repeat itself, so go get both books now. Don’t have a Kindle? No problem. You can get and read these books using the Kindle app, which is available for tablets, computers, and smart phones everywhere. And it’s free, too! Don’t like scifi, fantasy, or speculative fiction? Yes, you do! You dig fiction that is well-written and compelling, regardless of the artificial constraints of so-called genres. These two books are that stuff. Besides, what do you have to lose?

Remember, nothing free is really free. I would appreciate it if you offered a review on the Kindle Store after you’ve read my books. It helps out the writer almost as much as paying cash does. If you can’t offer a review for whatever reason, that’s okay. I mean, if both your arms are broken or you develop a sudden, clinical terror of keyboards, I understand and it’s no biggie.

But a review, however short, with a nice, big five-star rating always makes the author feel better about the world.

More and More

I got the email a few days ago, and it has changed my life. Not in an operatic Now I Go Forth to Spread the Word of the Lord way. More of a One More Gram to Tip the Scales way. A Last Straw Convincing the Camel It Needs a New Job. That sort of change.
I was checking my email as I always do, nothing there significant, a few Twitter responses, a few crits delivered by members of my writing groups, a few bits of spam. Then the screen blinked, and there it was, my rejection note from Harper-Voyager Publishers.
Three months ago I sent Isis Wept, my ancient Egypt fantasy, off to Harper. Three months, not a word. Then, with the previously mentioned email, I get a succinctly worded form rejection note. Now, I’m no stranger to rejection letters, no author is. I’ve a collection of them in a file cabinet a few feet away as I write this. I don’t take them personally. They are not a reflection of the quality of the work. More often, they inform one that a particular entity was not looking for that particular kind of work at that particular time, nothing more. One takes his rejection note and goes on to the next publisher or agent. That’s the way it’s done.
Or used to be done.
More and more, artists avoid the rejection slip parade altogether. They bypass agents, bypass publishers, and put out their stories themselves. Some of these authors self-publish exclusively. They wonder what chumps would spend weeks or months waiting on responses from barely considerate corporate entities, responses that are usually unhelpful and frustrating. Maybe it’s that dream of being validated by the powers that be, of getting a major power behind your art with all it’s advertising and distribution muscle, able to help you sell twenty or so books. This is the dream, or the dream peppered with reality.
I often wonder at these chumps myself, even though I’m one of them. But, more and more, I’ve been wondering why I need a publisher to validate me as an artist. I’ve self-published before, an eclectic piece called Last Days and Times that was too far outside the box for conventional publishers and subject to a thematic deadline as well. I’ve so far sold about 2500 copies of Last Days. It has garnered almost entirely 5-star reviews from readers. All it misses is a publicity machine to help readers find it. So, I’m a good writer. I’m not one of those it would be best to keep from the eyes of the reading public (there are many).
So, with the print publishing world contracting, with publishers expecting writers to do a good deal of the work publishers used to do for them, and for less money, why shouldn’t I just do the whole thing myself?
That’s a question I’ve been creeping up on for a long time. Publishing with a company would be easier assuming said company wanted to touch me with any length of pole. But, more and more, it would be only marginally easier. Self-publishing requires me to do all those things traditional publishers normally do for their authors. Just a few years ago, that was a deal-breaker. Now, however, traditional publishers have passed a great many of their responsibilities on to the writer. If I have to do the work anyway, I might as well get paid the higher percentage one gets through self-publishing.
I’m already doing some self-publishing. I mentioned Last Days and Times. I also have two other square but interesting pegs in Conqueror’s Realm and Shining Star, two books possibly too controversial for the largely conservative tastes of the traditional publishing industry. I’ve also published a collection of short stories and novellas, Harmonic RES. The question becomes, if I’m self-publishing four books, then why not do the same for all? Why should I circulate Isis Wept or any other book through the long ranks of agents and publishers, maybe for years, when I could just put it out there myself?
But, putting it out there myself is not the American Dream, now is it? Anybody can self-publish any old thing, no matter how poorly conceived or badly executed. Self-published novels have a reputation of poor writing, worse spelling, and lack of artistic finish. Is that the company I want to keep? That would be a serious question, except I’ve read too many books recently released through traditional publishers. Since publishing downsized and cut loose a good portion of its readers and editors, the quality of output hasn’t been much to admire. That isn’t the company I want to keep, either.
So here I am at the proverbial crossroads, and I’ve taken the turn. I will be self-publishing Isis Wept, probably within the next several weeks. I will follow that with Conqueror’s Realm, Shining Star, and the sequel to Last Days and Times. I hope to sell a lot of books, maybe make for a comfortable side income. I know the odds are against that, but I hope. One doesn’t write books not to have them read. If I should trip over an agent or publisher along the way, one who wishes to take on my work, my response will not be “Ooh, whee! yes, yes, yes!” but “What can you give me that I haven’t given myself?”
Then I’ll take their words under advisement.

The End is not Nigh!

Today is the 27th of December. The world did not end on December 21st. The Antichrist did not rise (that we know of), no planetoids slammed into Earth, no magnetic poles flip-flopped, and no aliens invaded (again, that we know of). We’re all still here. You might have noticed.

What you might not be privy to is the reason we’re all still here. The parties responsible aren’t exactly glory hounds. They aren’t about to stand in front of a news camera and bray, or write a letter to the editor, or star in a reality TV show. They saved us all, but they’re more than a little secretive about it. And they should be, as their activities weren’t, and never are, exactly legal.

Let’s put it this way. You heard about that mess on Lake Michigan, right? You know, that ferry sinking and the police grousing about all those merry-makers in their boats, who may have contributed to the accident? Who goes out on Lake Michigan in the winter, anyway? You’d have to be nuts. Waves can crash against that shore and spray thirty feet high, and if there’s ice, well, you can kiss a small boat goodbye. Anyway, you probably heard about the accident. What you didn’t hear was that it wasn’t any accident.

Well, maybe. Sorta. In the category of accidents while you’re playing with guns.

Most of you will be satisfied with the police and Coast Guard explanation. Personally, I don’t see how anybody could buy that fireworks… Well, never mind. People often blindly believe the spin-doctoring of authority figures. But for you more discerning and perceptive citizens, there is a way to the hidden truth. Read Last Days and Times. This book lays out the whole truth of the Lake Michigan Incident and everything that led up to it. I was able to write such an in-depth analysis not because I am particularly privileged or brilliant in any way, but because I was lucky. I live in Indianapolis, where it all started, and I’m buds with some of the primaries involved. What happened happened. It was bloody, frightening, and I didn’t think I’d survive it. But I did.

I did, but many did not. So, for all those who fell victim to the horror, especially for those on the Canal Walk, I felt compelled to write and publish their story. Let them never be forgotten, which is why their story, the story of how we almost went over the cliff of human extinction, costs only $1.99 in ebook at Kindle, only $2.99 at Smashwords for everything that isn’t Kindle ( and for Kindle, too, for that matter), and only $13.29 at lulu for the trade paperback.

If you are at all conscientious about the world, read this historical account of a shadow watershed event in human cruelty and heroism. You need to. After all, the barely-averted threat was turned away, not defeated. It’s still out there.

The only defense against it is vigilance.

Countdown to Terror! (11)

Eleven days until the end of the world! Are your party plans set? Yep, there are those among us who believe the world is in imminent danger of obliteration! We’re all gonna die! Jesus is about to return, and he is royally pissed. A gigantic planetoid is barreling toward us at enormous speed, so enormous that, even now, with it only eleven days away, the Earth’s planetary defense forces have not picked it up. The sun is about to burp plasma. The magnetic poles are about to shift. There’ll be earthquakes, fire, volcanoes, a terrible flood!

You know what eases the stress of impending doom? A good book! Read Last Days and Times, my very own interpretation of what happens on December 21, 2012, that most terrible and forbidding of days. Last Days and Times racks up the honors wherever it’s read. Five stars on Smashwords and Amazon. You can read it in ebook format before the electro-magnetic pulse sends us all back to the Stone Age for five minutes before the end. You can read it in book form if you order before all commerce collapses. And you can make me a little bit of completely useless money.

You unload your worthless economic icons unto me and get a valuable barter good in return. I bet no one’s made you a deal like that!

Waiting, Waiting, Waiting…

It is almost two months since I sent Isis Wept off to a particular publisher for consideration. This publisher does three distasteful and very common things. One, it takes as much as three months to decide if it will further consider a manuscript. That’s further consider, not accept and publish. Two, it only replies to manuscripts it accepts, not to those it deems not worthy of representation. Three, it frowns heavily upon simultaneously submitting the same work to other publishers. So, I send my work to this publisher, and I have to wait three months before I can pursue other avenues of distribution.

This is one reason authors are more and more opting to self-publish. It isn’t necessarily because every other avenue tells them “no!”. More and more often, it’s because those authors don’t want to deal with the lengthy, nearly medieval process of submitting to standard channels. It takes forever, and little consideration is given to the needs of the artist, without whom the literary industry cannot exist.

Now, I don’t really blame the publishing company for this intolerable chain of circumstances, I just recognize what’s happening and what the results will likely be. The publishing industry is getting pushed aside by the self-publishing phenomenon. Each year, more and more of the books available come to us through self-publishing sources. I think that, if the traditional publishing houses and the agents that feed them wish to be anything more than irrelevant in the coming decade, they need to change the way they operate. Okay, so it takes weeks or months to check out a manuscript. I can understand that, given the volume of manuscripts they receive. But, they must learn to accept, even encourage, simultaneous submissions. They should also take the time, however inconvenient, to reply to every submission, even if it’s just a form letter or form email. Sure, doing so means an aggregate of tons of extra time, but so what? That’s called customer service.

I believe I’m becoming typical of writers when I say that I would love to be published by a traditional company. It’s easier. The author might even make less money than if he published on his own, but the hassles would be gone. The formatting, the design, distribution, and much of the financial stuff would all be handled by the publisher. It would be nice. But, the hassles thrown up by the traditionals have their own drawbacks, and are, for many, more onerous than the alternative.

The alternative, over time, is becoming the first solution.

What Do You Like to Read?

I had this discussion with my students just the other day. What do people read? What is popular as opposed to quality reading? You would think that the two would be one and the same, but that might be a hasty conclusion to reach. Obviously, what people read is a matter of taste, but individual taste aggregated into mass literary favoritism spells what kind of taste, generally?

I like my reading to surprise me, to challenge me, and to be about something other than what is physically happening to the characters. I like my reading to be about something.

Okay, let me revise that last statement. I like my reading to really be about something. Harry Potter is about the trials of growing up into an adult world, to which I say, so what. You can tell Harry Potter is not on my list of must-reads. I find the writing bland, the characters tired retreads of stuff I’ve seen a hundred times, and the idea overarching the kiddie superhero plot is straight out of the generic aisle of the theme market.

I hear many groans, even gasps of horror and dismay. After all, Harry Potter is wildly popular, so what is wrong with me? I submit that Harry Potter is so popular simply because it does not surprise, it does not challenge, and it is amorphous in its ideals. It’s easy.

Well, sure, but it’s for kids, right?

That’s no excuse. What does it say about the state of art if something meant for kids is acceptable if bland? To Kill a Mockingbird was originally marketed as a children’s book. Nothing bland there. Huckleberry Finn. Nothing bland there.

So I come back to my original worry: what has become of the taste of our mass readership? The Hunger Games? Really? Fifty Shades of anything? Really?

Oh, well, maybe it’s always been so. I recall (not first hand, of course) that Don Quixote had quite a lot of empty-headed competition back there in the Romantic period. Archeologists have found porn in the trash dumps of ancient Palestine. Maybe I wonder at a problem that doesn’t exist. Or that has always existed.

Anna Karenina has come out, again, as a movie. It makes me want to read the book again — for the sixth or seventh time. I wonder how many of the present moviegoers have read the book at all

Isis Wept is in the Wild: Queries, Synopses, Rejections

This is always an auspicious day, a grand day, a scary day. My ancient Egyptian fantasy novel, Isis Wept, has gone through three writers’ groups, final edits, and the nail-biting ordeal of query letter and synopsis, and is now free in the world. I sent it out to its first prospective agent today. Will it be met with open, enthusiastic arms? With rank derision? With apathy? Only Ma’at can know.

But that brings up the important subject of sending manuscripts off to agents, and rejection letters.

First, the agent. There are rules about sending work to agents, and no, these aren’t the usual “rules” of writing, which are really no more than suggestions. These are rules, laws, adamantine edicts. You have to be careful when approaching an agent. You only get one shot at them.

You see, agents are busy people. As busy people, they don’t like to have their time wasted. So you treat your prospective agent with respect and a certain amount of deference. Definitely, definitely, give them what they want.

When choosing an agent for your work, pick one who specializes in your chosen form of art. See who they represent and read some of those authors. That way, you get a decent idea as to whether you and that agent will mesh. You can find information about agents in the usual traditional sources, like Writers Market and Writers Digest, both of which you’d find at the public library. Or you could go to the web, to resources such as Preditors and Editors or WritersNet. Find your agent, go to their web site, and carefully read what they have to say. Pay particular attention to their submission guidelines, including what they accept and don’t accept, or whether they’re taking any submissions at all. If they match your needs, then submit your work exactly as they direct. If they ask for a query letter, do not send a manuscript. If they ask for a query letter or synopsis, follow their precise directions on how to create those documents. If they offer no directions, then search the web and your library for advice, templates, and examples to follow.

Give the agent what they want, only what they want, and how they want it. They don’t have time for your ego.

Remember, in your correspondence with an agent, that you are attempting to enter into a business relationship, and it’s a buyer’s market. You are not doing the agent a favor by allowing them to see your awesome manuscript idea. They have a hundred other good, solid authors lined up behind you, and they’re only taking on two that day. Be polite.

When they ask for a query letter or synopsis, do not knock those off in a lazy afternoon. Stew over them. Remember, the agent hasn’t seen word one of your manuscript. They are deciding if they will represent you entirely on the query and/or synopsis, so those had better be good. Write them up, put them away for a few days, then pull them out and rewrite them. Put them through your writers critique group. Rewrite them again. Pour over them looking for spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors. Make sure you spelled the agent’s name correctly. Make sure you spelled your name correctly. Grab the agent’s attention, but don’t be pushy. Showmanship helps, but don’t look ridiculous. These documents are your foot in the door. If they don’t stand up, your manuscript has no chance.

Get it all together, all the stuff the agent requests, make it all pretty, informative, professional and short, then send it off in your agent’s preferred manner. And wait.

Even if you are God’s gift to literature, your most likely response from the agent is … rejection. You get that little slip of a papercut in the mail, and it’s like you opened a greeting card from the Unabomber. Poor you. This is where it helps to have developed a writer’s thick skin. Understand, though, that rejections are not personal. The agent is just saying, “No, thanks.” They could reject you for any of a hundred reasons, and they are unlikely to tell you any of them. They’re busy, remember? Your only professional response is to mark that agent off your list and start hunting up another one.

I hope you get an acceptance on your first try, that your book goes on to become a New York Times bestseller, win lots of awards, and get made into a movie starring [fill in A-list actor here]. But the most likely outcome of sending out your work is rejection. And rejection. And rejection. Stephen King amassed over six hundred rejections before he sold his first story. Carrie, his horror classic, was rejected more than thirty times. Margaret Mitchell’s Gone With the Wind was rejected thirty-eight times. Frank Herbert’s Dune was rejected twenty times. So. if you get a rejection letter, or even a lot of them, you’re in good company.

I think Isis Wept is a good story well written. I feel it in my heart and liver. But I also expect it to be rejected, just on the odds. I further expect to send it out again until it finds the right venue, the right match for whatever destiny awaits it.

Why do we fall? they ask in the latest round of Batman movies. So we can learn to pick ourselves up.

 

Logistics and Putting Words Down on a Page

How do you build a story? This is a big question, an important one. An awful lot of people start novels, but very few actually finish them. People start out with an energetic approach to an exciting tale, then either tire, get distracted, or write themselves into an inescapable corner. So, how do you approach a story so that, first and foremost, you finish a first draft?

Some writers outline. They map out the story from beginning to end, chapter by chapter, usually in writing. That way, they know exactly what they need to accomplish scene by scene, chapter by chapter. This technique, if enforced across all authors, would make me want to jump off a bridge. Not that there’s anything wrong with outlining, it just isn’t a technique that awakens my muse. Too much like writing high school research papers.

Then there’s the “seat of the pants” writer. These are the ones least likely to finish a story. They sit down at the computer (or lie on their back with the iPad, like I am now) and just start typing, willing to let the story go where it will. Their writing is free, unfettered by the plodding restraint of following an outline or generally knowing what you’re doing. Maybe these writers get lucky and wind up somewhere near a logical end to a cohesive story. More likely, they get lost. They come to realize they don’t know where they’re going and they give up on getting there. Seat of the pantsers are those guys with a dozen beginnings to books they never finish.

Somewhere between the outliners and the pantsers lie the musers. Musers come up with a story idea, but they don’t hunch over a keyboard or paper and write down every linear aspect of it. Nor do they get to the writing right away. The muser thinks about the story, let’s it germinate in his head, develops its plot and theme over a long period of time. He wants to know what happens, and why. He wants to know where the story will go. He may consider the story for weeks, or months, before he settles in to write the first word. So, he kind of outlines, but in his head, not on paper. And he doesn’t order every little thing, or even every big thing, but instead lines up ideas and meaning. Not “John goes to the grocery. He buys a banana. The banana is bad. He takes it back. The grocer shows him a sign that says, ‘All purchases final’. John learns he should read the sign and check the banana before he lays down his money.” It’s more like “Main character makes a minor mistake that teaches him to think ahead”. I’m a muser.

Figure out which writer you are. There are strengths to each, if they fit your personality. The outliner is more efficient. The pantser is more organic. The muser is both. On points, the outliner, if he ever gets out of the outline phase, is the most likely to finish a story, and faster. Which brings up the next concern in this whole idea of how we build stories.

Avoid those traps that distract you from your purpose. If you’re the outliner, remember that your goal is to write the story, not the outline. There comes a time, when you have at least the beginning, middle and end of your tale, and some number of elements among them, when you need to stop enumerating isolated points and settle into creating a narrative from them. If you’re the pantser, stop going back and rewriting sections you think you might not have done to your best. Your job is to write the story, from the beginning to the end, not from the beginning to the middle, to the beginning, to the middle, to that part just before the middle, to the middle… Leave rewrites to the rewrite phase, which is after the first draft is finished. Finally, if you’re the muser, don’t muse too much, and don’t muse too little. Can you see here the danger of musing? The danger of never starting in the first place? The danger of starting too soon and becoming a de facto pantser? There’s also the danger, since you don’t write down your musings, of forgetting your story. I’m serious.

All this, and my last couple of posts, are by way of pointing out the difficulty of just the logistics of writing. It’s hard just to get started, which is why so few people end up being writers. Think about it. How many times do you hear someone say that, due to personal difficulties, they just haven’t had time lately to write? Like writing requires a certain time. They can only write at their special desk between the hours of two and four on odd-numbered Tuesdays. With a special pen. While listening to Ravel. All that is silly. If you, as a writer, want all that for your writing pleasure, that’s fine. But on the days where you can’t get into your office, write anyway. Shoehorn it into every little nook of time you can find. Write on the bus, while standing in line at Wal-Mart, while on the toilet. Or admit you aren’t really interested. Maybe you have priorities, like you have a day job. So make writing your night job, or your four in the morning job. Perhaps, for whatever reason, you’re too overwrought to write. This is possible, I know. So write about what makes you overwrought.

Writing isn’t that hard. We all start learning it in first grade. Writing well, now that’s another story, and a scary one. Getting started writing in the first place, then finishing that thing you started, that’s the sweetest story of all.

Self-publishing or Traditional Publishing, Which Road Does a Writer Travel?

Two things are true if anything is: one, self-publishing is the future of the literary world. Two, the future is not yet here.

I’ve heard and read a lot about how the traditional method of publishing is collapsing under a weight of inflexibility and inertia. The traditional method of writers seeking agents and agents seeking publishers for writers just can’t work anymore, or perhaps shouldn’t be allowed to work. The writer is almost slave labor in this scenario. He does most of the work but is the last to be paid, and he is paid but a fraction of the worth of his sweat. Few artists can even enter into this program of servitude, for agents and publishers increasingly choose to minimize risk by sticking with already established artists. The literary world has become a closed club. It’s not how well you write that gets you published, it’s who you know. Or, that’s what I’ve heard and read.

I’ve also read that self-publishing is a superior model, a more democratic model, one that allows art to see the light of day and allows the artist to reap the rewards of his work. I’ve heard starry-eyed proponents tell us of a halcyon world in which writers learn all aspects of the publishing chain, not just their artistic niche of it. Artists publish their own works the way they think they should be published. Damn the publicist, full speed ahead! And the artist earns the lion’s share of profit from his work. And sells his work, and is in control of his reader base and how they are approached. The artist is no longer a cog in a machine. He has become the machine, and it is beautiful.

Both of these views are loads of crap.

The publishing industry is not evil. Publishers and agents do not enrich themselves on the blood of the common man. Unless the common man is an idiot, and then he deserves what he gets. Of course, that’s only the disreputable agents and publishers, the ones anyone with sense would avoid. Publishers and agents are in business for flowery reasons like love of art, but let’s face it, they’re really there to make a buck. They have bills to pay, just like anyone else. So, it isn’t in their interests to take chances. They have to call the ball as best they can and hope it flies smooth and straight. And if it doesn’t, does the writer take the financial heat? No, the writer has already been paid an advance. If the art falls short of expectations, the publisher takes the hit, loses the money. The agent takes it on the chin when the publisher starts looking askance at their recommendations. These are the guys who take all the risk. The artist risks only his pride, and maybe some fantasy residuals.

Self-publishing isn’t a party, either. When you self-publish, you do all the jobs somebody else used to do. You edit your book, or pay someone to. You design the book interior, or pay someone to. You design the cover, or pay someone to. You publish, you promote, you sell. So, be honest, where in all this do you get to write?

There’s a very good reason the writer has been segregated in the traditional system. If I have to clarify what that reason is after the last line of that last paragraph, then you aren’t paying attention.

I’m not a big fan of the writer as vertically integrated business model. Personally, I like to write. I want to spend my time creatively, not shoveling around in the ditches of business. I detest selling. I like the prospect of designing a book, but I detest selling.

You may roll your eyes and feel superior from reading those words, and I know those words mean I won’t be a best seller or even a writer who lives on his writing. I write pretty good stuff, but since I don’t promote it, I doubt many people will see it.

Self-publishing can be great. You can be successful at self-publishing. You just have to assemble the right mix of spending your life’s savings, ignoring your family, amassing widely differing skill sets, working yourself to death, and, most importantly, luck. Yes, luck is important, don’t fool yourself into thinking otherwise. You self-publish your great American novel and it goes plop! into the middle of a titanic sea of self-published books. It is impossible, just impossible, for your book to differentiate itself from the crowd without a big, heaping helping of pure, dumb luck. And that’s if your work is good. Most self-published work is poor work indeed, put out by authors with poor command of their chosen language and with barely an inkling of how to clearly express themselves. After all, what’s to stop them from publishing? Absolutely nothing. There are no guardians at the gate, no agents rejecting this or publishers rejecting that. Anyone who wants to publish, can, regardless of whether or not they can write.

And your book swims among them, one of hundreds of thousands, even millions, all indistinguishable on any of several web sites.

When luck strikes, or you make your luck by spending piles of money, or if you’re already famous and so a shoe-in, then success is a great thing. The problem is, only a few get to win the lottery. You can make a good push at that winning ticket, but the effort is enormous and assurance of winning isn’t even close to a given. But, hey, that’s the American way, right? Victory goes to those who work harder than everyone else. Except that isn’t true. It never was.

What am I getting at? Give up? Forget it? The odds are against you so don’t even try? No. Just this. Look on publishing with a clear head. Don’t quit your day job, even if you have some success. If you have a product that might attract the traditional publishers, go for it. That way, you can write more since you will be selling less. If the work you created is unsuitable for the conservative tastes of the traditional publishers, or time sensitive, self-publish it. You probably won’t gross dime one in either case. Or maybe you’ll become the next hot property.

Next, decide what you’re going to put into the product. How much money are you willing to spend (the smart answer here is pretty near to zero)? How much time are you willing to give up? How much is your time and your money worth? At what point does your art lose and your life win?

These are questions you need to ask yourself and need to find comfortable answers to. I know too many authors, good authors, who have shopped books for years to the traditionals, to no avail. I know too many authors of awful books who have spent thousands of dollars on editors and designers who are more than happy to take their money on a project that will never catch. I know too many writers with garages full of books, who pathetically travel from conference to convention to tent revival selling books out of their cars. They spent thousands of dollars for that garage full of books, and they’re just trying to make their money back.

As writers, we need to be realistic about the industry and realistic about ourselves. If we are, we increase the odds of success, though we can never, never manipulate our luck. If we are not realistic about our chances, our work, or ourselves, then we are just lining up to be victims of an industry that can either make us or eat us alive. And it doesn’t much care which one it does.

On Readin’ an’ Writin’: Story Types

There are two kinds of stories, the yarn and the Great Expression of the Human Condition. Neither is better than the other in any sort of qualitative way. They’re just directed at different sensibilities. The yarn is what you tell around campfires. The Great Expression of the Human Condition is what you tell in the courts of kings. A yarn cannot compete with a Great Expression of the Human Condition (hereafter referred to as the GEHC) where it comes to depth and both intrinsic and extrinsic meaning. Yet the GEHC cannot compete with the yarn in pure “Hey, guys, watch this!” exuberance. The important thing is not which kind of story to write, but to decide which kind of story to write.

I don’t, perhaps can’t, write yarns. I’ve tried. No matter what my intentions might be at the beginning, I can’t avoid injecting my stories with Big Questions and Guiding Principles. It’s a disease, perhaps. I know folks, though, who write engaging yarns, stories about pirates and space ships and cowboys and what have you, but about little else. Escapist literature, not introspective literature. And it’s good. I’m thinking right now of an ambitious, excitable yarn I love and have read a couple of times, Dogfight, by Dick Thomas (only $2.99 at Smashwords!) It’s pizza delivery boys vs. werewolves, and not much else. But, do you really need much else?

That’s the yarn. Then there are people, and I fit into this category most of the time, who do a bit of both. They write the escapist yarn that slips in a bit of the Big Question. Or the Big Question with a flavoring of escapist yarn.

What you write, if you write, is a question of your personal sensibilities. Don’t worry about what others might expect. Don’t worry about what might be commercial or whether you might be “selling out”, just write what wants to come out of you. You’re likely to find that you really can’t write anything else.

I once tried to write a romance novel on a bet, seeing as I am noted for my hatred of the romance genre. I tried, I really did. I made an honest effort to limit my words to the conventions of that genre, which I knew well. But, I just couldn’t do it. I couldn’t make a story center on the passionate love of one person for another and their trials in their journey to consummate that love. That, to me, was just stupid. Who cares? Especially when the journey requires certain character actions and plot devices at certain word counts in the story, and, yes, mountain lions (or a reasonable facsimile). No, I got about ten thousand words into the story and had to divert it to another path, one pondering the GEHC. I guess the romance still went its course, but it became the secondary, perhaps tertiary point of the story, something to pull the reader from one introspective thought on humanity to the other. Big fail, if you wanted a romance story. But, I liked it!

So, here’s the thing. when you find yourself wondering, as a writer, if you should write this or that because it may not be commercial or it may not be what the reader expects, ask yourself one question. Is the way you want to write that story the way it wants to be written? Then go for it. There is a publisher for every well-written story, if you can find him or her.

And, if you’re a reader thinking, “Wait a minute, this isn’t the way my favorite (fill in genre here) story is supposed to go. It’s supposed…” I say, lean back, continue, and allow your expectations to be broken. Do you really want to read the same friggin’ story over and over again? If so, there’s no hope for you. Learn to enjoy varying, unexpected riffs on the theme, whatever that theme might be.

Lastly, if you’re a writer who desires to write a yarn, something with space ships and rocket packs and virile, young, lantern-jawed heroes and beautiful half-neckit women, then go for it. There are tons of people who want to read that story. There are tons of people who want to read the predictable, formulaic romance story, too. Not me, but if that’s what you want to write, do so, and with gusto. I won’t be buying it, but many, many others will.

As long as your grammar and spelling are passable, and that goes for everybody.